Page 19 of 19
Posted: Mon Apr 12, 2004 6:13 am
by johann83
fichmana2003 wrote:Just one thing... The changes to this release are too significant, IMHO, to be labeled 4.03. I suggest v. 4.1.
Not that it is really a big deal what the version number is, but I tend to agree with this post. You have made a relatively significant number of improvements to IR, more than would warrant a .0x version number (which seemed to be reserved mainly for bug fixes in the past).
Matt
Posted: Mon Apr 12, 2004 6:15 am
by e34m5
Ok. Works for me. I'll suggest 4.1. Tx
Anything else.
Posted: Mon Apr 12, 2004 8:14 am
by fichmana2003
Actually, I think version numbers *are* important. Most IR users (the ones posting to Beginners & General) are not tech savvy and do not follow this thread. To them, a new release with a significant version # increase means there are some major differences and additions. How many of you bothered to upgrade to IR 4.02? I didn't; it had nothing for me (and I actually bothered to check), and 4.01 works just fine.
Posted: Mon Apr 12, 2004 8:22 am
by e34m5
ok