Dish Network Receivers
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2003 6:12 pm
I have an 8811 which works, out of the box, with neither of my Dish Network Receviers, one of which is an Echostar Model 4000, the other a later model JVC. This, despite the fact that the manual includes satellite device codes for both makes. The remote can, however, successfully learn codes to control them. I get the impression, after scanning the forums and docs, that there might be some history regarding these devices (an erroneous protocol, perhaps?). When I examine learned commands in IR.EXE, it indicates the "dishplayer (old)" protocol (for the JVC, anyway). Can anyone shortcut me to the relevant info, if it exists?
Also, is there a document that contains background info about ERCs, OBCs, Protocols, Upgrades, Extensions, etc.? I'm slowly putting the picture together, but it's taking a lot of time scouring the docs, spreadsheets and source to piece together the answers. Matters are made more complicated by the fact that I don't have Excel, and the Java alternative does not seem to be usable yet, at least not for my remote.
My gratitude and admiration to the members of this forum who have created the tools and docs to customize these remotes. I have every expectation that, once I assemble the appropriate details, I'll be able to use them to extract far more functionality from this remove than would have been, otherwise, possible.
Thanks in Advance,
Dave
Also, is there a document that contains background info about ERCs, OBCs, Protocols, Upgrades, Extensions, etc.? I'm slowly putting the picture together, but it's taking a lot of time scouring the docs, spreadsheets and source to piece together the answers. Matters are made more complicated by the fact that I don't have Excel, and the Java alternative does not seem to be usable yet, at least not for my remote.
My gratitude and admiration to the members of this forum who have created the tools and docs to customize these remotes. I have every expectation that, once I assemble the appropriate details, I'll be able to use them to extract far more functionality from this remove than would have been, otherwise, possible.
Thanks in Advance,
Dave