Insignia with Common JP1.3 Extender (update11.12.2013) v3.02
Moderator: Moderators
Insignia with Common JP1.3 Extender (update11.12.2013) v3.02
With Insignia-67100, RemoteMaster v2.02, and the Common JP1 Extender update v3.02 (dated 11.12.2013, unclemiltie thank you) and starting from scratch:- https://www.hifi-remote.com/forums/dload ... e_id=12202
The BluRay commands Rec(mains IR power switch), Power, and Input, work individually when their buttons are pressed in Mode dev0, and pressing the button shift-0, on which special command Pause15 has been configured, causes the indicator to light. However, in the macro on button 'Audio/DynVol':- Dev_dev0; Rec; Power; Shift-0; Input, only Rec and Input have any effect i.e. Power and Shift-0 (pause15) do not work yet. Help please
The BluRay commands Rec(mains IR power switch), Power, and Input, work individually when their buttons are pressed in Mode dev0, and pressing the button shift-0, on which special command Pause15 has been configured, causes the indicator to light. However, in the macro on button 'Audio/DynVol':- Dev_dev0; Rec; Power; Shift-0; Input, only Rec and Input have any effect i.e. Power and Shift-0 (pause15) do not work yet. Help please
-
unclemiltie
- Expert
- Posts: 1819
- Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2004 12:50 pm
- Location: Pittsburgh, PA
and the extended version
https://www.hifi-remote.com/forums/dload ... e_id=12202
Insignia after 981 reset
https://www.hifi-remote.com/forums/dload ... e_id=12204
https://www.hifi-remote.com/forums/dload ... e_id=12202
Insignia after 981 reset
https://www.hifi-remote.com/forums/dload ... e_id=12204
Any thoughts so far? Have installed an extender before but chickened out and this is the first attempt to start to do a full setup.
Have I posted the right info, or done something obviously wrong from the start please? Although prefer to use Insignia, have now tried the same thing with RCRP05b and its extender with the same results
Have I posted the right info, or done something obviously wrong from the start please? Although prefer to use Insignia, have now tried the same thing with RCRP05b and its extender with the same results
-
unclemiltie
- Expert
- Posts: 1819
- Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2004 12:50 pm
- Location: Pittsburgh, PA
-
unclemiltie
- Expert
- Posts: 1819
- Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2004 12:50 pm
- Location: Pittsburgh, PA
I just looked at your rmir file and don't see anything out of the ordinary.
The Dev_Dev0 should set the temp device for the extender and all keys that process after that are using the temp device since the temp device is valid. when the macro terminates the temp device is invalidated so the remote goes back to processing things as it should. Thus all of those keys should be coming from dev0.
Can you do me a favor. Can you try to re-create this in the previous extender for the Insignia remote and see if you have the same issue. This combined extender is actually a port of that remote and when I first did it I did a byte-for-byte comparison after every change and assembly of the code to make sure that I didn't break anything. But that was a year ago and I have since done some work to make the code smaller. I'm wondering if I broke something along the way?
Is anyone else seeing this kind of stuff in the combined extenders on other remotes? The only previous extenders that used the Set_Dev (8900 style) HT setup are the RCA and the Insignia but all of the other remotes are using this now.
The Dev_Dev0 should set the temp device for the extender and all keys that process after that are using the temp device since the temp device is valid. when the macro terminates the temp device is invalidated so the remote goes back to processing things as it should. Thus all of those keys should be coming from dev0.
Can you do me a favor. Can you try to re-create this in the previous extender for the Insignia remote and see if you have the same issue. This combined extender is actually a port of that remote and when I first did it I did a byte-for-byte comparison after every change and assembly of the code to make sure that I didn't break anything. But that was a year ago and I have since done some work to make the code smaller. I'm wondering if I broke something along the way?
Is anyone else seeing this kind of stuff in the combined extenders on other remotes? The only previous extenders that used the Set_Dev (8900 style) HT setup are the RCA and the Insignia but all of the other remotes are using this now.
this JP1 stuff is a sickness!
-
vickyg2003
- Site Admin
- Posts: 7109
- Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 12:19 pm
- Location: Florida
- Contact:
FYI: I had a little trouble with the Set_Dev style extenders when developing my code. Sometimes the division for the device assignment wouldn't finish before the device number was stored. When I stepped through the code slowly it always worked, but when I let the code fly it became a timing issue.unclemiltie wrote: Is anyone else seeing this kind of stuff in the combined extenders on other remotes? The only previous extenders that used the Set_Dev (8900 style) HT setup are the RCA and the Insignia but all of the other remotes are using this now.
Unclemiltie, when trying to recreate it with extender v0.02, or with v1,02 I ran into the following sequence of two error messages:-
"No remote found with signature starting 3A47 and EPROM size 3K"
"No remote found that matches the merge file, exinstall terminating"
In earlier unextended .rmirs for the Insignia67100 remote, and after a 981 reset, the Raw data tab says signature 31473147 and with the combined extender it merges ok using 3X47.
In case you did not see the earlier thread about this, I should have mentioned that Vicky also tried to help with this earlier but eventually referred me to you https://www.hifi-remote.com/forums/viewt ... c&&start=0
I will try out the image I posted then again, because [in the latest extended image posted here, the red indicator did not light when the15sec pause should be in progress], but now remember that it did light earlier, suggesting the pause was actually trying to work then, but does not do so now
"No remote found with signature starting 3A47 and EPROM size 3K"
"No remote found that matches the merge file, exinstall terminating"
In earlier unextended .rmirs for the Insignia67100 remote, and after a 981 reset, the Raw data tab says signature 31473147 and with the combined extender it merges ok using 3X47.
In case you did not see the earlier thread about this, I should have mentioned that Vicky also tried to help with this earlier but eventually referred me to you https://www.hifi-remote.com/forums/viewt ... c&&start=0
I will try out the image I posted then again, because [in the latest extended image posted here, the red indicator did not light when the15sec pause should be in progress], but now remember that it did light earlier, suggesting the pause was actually trying to work then, but does not do so now
PS I reconstituted the macro in that older rmir:
https://www.hifi-remote.com/forums/dload ... e_id=12227
- again Power does not work in the macro but power does work when the power button is pressed in dev_0 device mode (on button SAP).
However, as before with this extended .rmir, the red indicator on the remote stays lit for a while after starting the macro 'start BTT370' so Pause IS indeed working in this extended .rmir, and hope that might provide a clue. Apologies that I cannot work out how I came to that stage but it still seems to be based on the common extender 3.02
https://www.hifi-remote.com/forums/dload ... e_id=12227
- again Power does not work in the macro but power does work when the power button is pressed in dev_0 device mode (on button SAP).
However, as before with this extended .rmir, the red indicator on the remote stays lit for a while after starting the macro 'start BTT370' so Pause IS indeed working in this extended .rmir, and hope that might provide a clue. Apologies that I cannot work out how I came to that stage but it still seems to be based on the common extender 3.02
-
unclemiltie
- Expert
- Posts: 1819
- Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2004 12:50 pm
- Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Thanks, this is the macro using the v1.01 extender.
https://www.hifi-remote.com/forums/dload ... e_id=12229
The pause special function works but not BTT370 power toggle in the macro (power toggle works ok when issued by button-press from dev0 device mode)
https://www.hifi-remote.com/forums/dload ... e_id=12229
The pause special function works but not BTT370 power toggle in the macro (power toggle works ok when issued by button-press from dev0 device mode)
-
unclemiltie
- Expert
- Posts: 1819
- Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2004 12:50 pm
- Location: Pittsburgh, PA
that older extender is pretty much proven that the temp device selection (which is the only thing that could have been getting in your way) works well. A lot of people use it.
The code in the new extender is identical to that extender so I was wondering if I hit something else somewhere else.
My suspicion is that you have a repeat or timing problem. When you push the button on the remote you are actually holding it quite long compared to how long a single command is formatted in a macro. Try this, the macros will hold the last key of the macro when the button is held. put the power at the end and see if that works. if it does, then you have a repeat issue.
The code in the new extender is identical to that extender so I was wondering if I hit something else somewhere else.
My suspicion is that you have a repeat or timing problem. When you push the button on the remote you are actually holding it quite long compared to how long a single command is formatted in a macro. Try this, the macros will hold the last key of the macro when the button is held. put the power at the end and see if that works. if it does, then you have a repeat issue.
this JP1 stuff is a sickness!
For the v1.01 version,
with the macro: Dev_dev0;Power;Rec;Shift-0;Input
.....changed to: Dev_dev0;Rec;Shift-0;Input;Power
- and then 'Rec'(lime plug power toggle) no longer worked to switch the plug, and 'Shift-0'(pause 15secs) no longer lighted up the indicator steadily for some time as it did before.
When the early part of the macro had been rendered inneffective, it was hard to say if Power might have worked any better at the end, because it cannot work at all unless the Lime plug has been turned on first.
However, if 'Rec' was done manually before operating the macro, Power still did not get turned on by the last instruction either.
From this, it could seem that it could be the first or second instructions after Dev_dev0, which are somehow critical or sensitive and,
after all, not just that 'Power' was especially being affected. Indeed if Power is simply removed from the macro, that seems to do nothing at all, except to light the indicator while the button is held down.
Restoring the position of Power in the macro made it work as before, with just Power not working, and Rec and the delay being effective.
The Input also worked if the Power was done manually (Rec did not turn off the lime plug because that has a latent period when it does not respond)
with the macro: Dev_dev0;Power;Rec;Shift-0;Input
.....changed to: Dev_dev0;Rec;Shift-0;Input;Power
- and then 'Rec'(lime plug power toggle) no longer worked to switch the plug, and 'Shift-0'(pause 15secs) no longer lighted up the indicator steadily for some time as it did before.
When the early part of the macro had been rendered inneffective, it was hard to say if Power might have worked any better at the end, because it cannot work at all unless the Lime plug has been turned on first.
However, if 'Rec' was done manually before operating the macro, Power still did not get turned on by the last instruction either.
From this, it could seem that it could be the first or second instructions after Dev_dev0, which are somehow critical or sensitive and,
after all, not just that 'Power' was especially being affected. Indeed if Power is simply removed from the macro, that seems to do nothing at all, except to light the indicator while the button is held down.
Restoring the position of Power in the macro made it work as before, with just Power not working, and Rec and the delay being effective.
The Input also worked if the Power was done manually (Rec did not turn off the lime plug because that has a latent period when it does not respond)